We have identified the following challenges:
Abstract
Unlike many industries, operators have strict procedures for enrolling material suppliers for their networks.
There are two visible steps for a supplier who wants to sell to a utility:
This not-so-complex but tedious procedure, standard in most of the world's global utilities, results in companies ending up working with their traditional suppliers. Although reliable, it weakens their negotiating position and makes them buy more expensive.
On the other hand, it is not common to get utilities to go out and find their suppliers, either because of lack of time or because there are no easy tools to reach and connect with new suppliers.
The next challenge for the buyer is to persuade the homologation unit to take the time to qualify the suppliers achieved. This may be the biggest bottleneck to expanding the supplier list.
Global contractors and IPPs must buy at the best price, so they look for the best suppliers anywhere globally and pre-qualify them at the end-user, if necessary.
Many construction companies just do not have the registration and homologation scope which makes the discovery processes dynamic and effective.
We have observed that large world manufacturers have difficulties entering large utilities:
"If you want to be our supplier, sign up in our E-procurement"
The user experience turns the utility into a sort of black box. Not having the chance to promote their company and their product, much less the opportunity to feed the utility with updates of their new projects, generates such a huge turn-off that many lose interest.
It explains the vast gap between the suppliers who start registration and those who finally finish it. The differential becomes even more significant when considering the number of suppliers approved for a bidding process.
Another common problem is that since buyers are usually not specialists in the product, getting suppliers is much more complicated, making them dependent on the end-user and often killing the chances of getting new suppliers.
One of the considerable limitations of marketplaces and risk analysis platforms is that the supplier must register and generally pay.
It means that none of these two solutions guarantee the buyer’s total visibility of the market.
So, when utilities look for new suppliers, they must go through dozens of e-commerce, read dozens of reports, analyze websites through internet searches and then deal with hundreds of people to find out which of them are a perfect fit for their company.
Neither utilities nor suppliers are fully connected, generating what Deepak Maholtra describes in his book Negotiation Genius, as negative value generation. What the manufacturer fails to sell more than the buyer fails to save becomes a negative value.
The market must look for solutions to break all these barriers through strategies and resources such as:
We have large customer utilities like National Grid, EDP, Acciona Energy, Nordex, Red Electrica, and many others. Feel free to write to support@babelus.com and we can share use cases documents so you can learn how these companies are improving the supplier base and saving money and time.